Tendulkar, Chennai, Hyderabad, 1999, 2009, Times of India, Plagiarism, Bakri and Gadha

by AR Hemant on November 7, 2009 · 17 comments

in Crazy Things I Did In 2009, Nitpicking, You know what pisses me off?

I’ve followed cricket with great interest for most of my life, first as a fan and then as a journalist. Fans tend to get excited about teams, stars and results. But journalists become hardened cynics over a period of time. Sure, hacks love the game dearly, but without getting emotional about results. Win or lose, journalists have a job: to present cold, hard facts, and then perhaps analyse what went wrong or right.

But no matter how thick-skinned they are, a loss like the one at Hyderabad is a kick in the nuts. I’ll speak for myself. It hurts. Really bad.

Many of us have been discussing how Hyderabad 2009 is similar to Chennai 1999, when India lost to Pakistan by a gut-wrenching margin of 12 runs. In both cases, Tendulkar got a big hundred, raised hopes of a jail-breaking win, got out, and then the rest of the batting line-up had the tensile strength of a marie biscuit.

My colleague Arjun Sen first mentioned a possible similarity between 1999 and 2009, when we were discussing the match on my Facebook status.

I later thought it’d be worthwhile comparing the Chennai and Hyderabad scorecards to detect similarities. On top of my mind were 1) a Tendulkar hundred, 2) Nayan Mongia and Raina getting fifties and 3)  a partnership of 130-odd runs in both games.

But once I began the analysis, the findings were startling. Eerie. Bizarre. Unbelievable. And mostly too good to be true. We suspected Chennai and Hyderabad were similar, but here was eye-popping data that confirmed our suspicion.

I ran the report on the findings on India Today an hour or so after the Hyderabad match.

Later, I updated the copy twice when I found some more eye-popping data from the two scorecards.

The story was picked up by In.com and later by Cricinfo’s Surfer.

Later this evening, blog buddy Arvind Iyer saw my report. My jaw dropped when he said he’d read something similar in the Bangalore edition of Times of India today.

So I looked up their epaper. And here’s what I find, on Sports Pg 1 .

ajab

Fantastic headline, and a five-star rating, too. (Update: Venkat Ananth points me to TOI’s Mumbai edition which carries the same infographic. I’m guessing this originated from Mumbai.)

Now, the connections between Chennai ’99 and Hyderabad ’09 have been talked about by thousands of cricket followers. I’m just one of them. And the stats which establish these connections are also out in public domain.

But what gets my bakri is the sequence of TOI’s points. They are exactly similar to the sequence in which I wrote them.

Without suggesting anything, I’ll just add that TOI & Sons are known offenders in such matters. Ask Twilight Fairy, The Cook’s Cottage, Food For Thought, Jai Arjun, to name a few. They’ve given bloggers a hard time, and now they’ve done it to someone of their own community.

I’ll leave it at that. I hope India kick Australia’s gadha tomorrow. There, I said it. It was an emotional outburst. But only because Hyderabad still hurts.

{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Abhinav November 7, 2009 at 11:33 pm

Haah! very interesting!!
History does repeats!

yeah, India will kick back!

Reply

2 AR Hemant November 7, 2009 at 11:42 pm

Thanks Abhinav. I hope they do.

Reply

3 Mads November 8, 2009 at 9:40 pm

Good post..dont know what to say exactly…
We lost the series now :(

Reply

4 AR Hemant November 8, 2009 at 9:45 pm

We lost to a side that didn’t have at least seven of their first-choice players. What can one say? Australia were awesome, India never showed up.

Reply

5 Varun November 9, 2009 at 10:05 pm

Would you believe that even A. Swaminathan Iyer (or is it Aiyar? Am off TOI for too long now.) of Swaminomics recently reproduced a list of top 10 reasons why Delhi didn’t vote…straight off a Facebook note by N. Madhavan who happens to be the financial editor with Hindustan Times! No credit was given except the suggestion that it was found online.

And you have every reason to believe its your work they have flicked shamelessly. Sad. Let me webcast it on twitter and FB at least.

Reply

6 AR Hemant November 9, 2009 at 10:19 pm

Amazing. This only reinforces my view on TOI’s practices. They really ought to educate their staff on copyrights and the concepts of fair and ethical use. Their abuse of copyrights is very well document by many bloggers. Thanks for the push. Also, I’ve added you on FB.

Reply

7 Preeti Hoon November 10, 2009 at 1:44 pm

LOL can’t believe, TOI??? God! Nice read, Hemant :)

Reply

8 AR Hemant November 10, 2009 at 1:51 pm

You better believe it. :)

Reply

9 Giridhar November 10, 2009 at 1:53 pm

can’t u sue them?

Plagiarism is a serious offense…

Reply

10 AR Hemant November 10, 2009 at 1:54 pm

Not sure I have the legal grounds for that, Giridhar.

Reply

11 RM November 10, 2009 at 7:23 pm

Good show mate. You ripped the clothes of the Empress of Boribunder.

Reply

12 Fresher Jobs November 10, 2009 at 11:09 pm

Great Post Hemant !!

Reply

13 AR Hemant November 10, 2009 at 11:13 pm

Thanks, Fresher. Are you related to Steve?

Reply

14 Fresher Jobs November 21, 2009 at 2:26 am

Sorry Hemant.

I am not sure about whom are you referring to here ?

Reply

15 AR Hemant November 21, 2009 at 11:17 pm

Never mind. Bad joke.

Reply

16 Fresher Jobs November 28, 2009 at 1:54 pm

No Probs :-)

17 manoj November 11, 2009 at 10:48 pm

Thats what times people can do…they neither know how to research nor how to copy even. Bloody times…

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post:

</