Busting the Popular Myths of Gujarat’s Prohibition

by AR Hemant on November 29, 2009 · 12 comments

in Brilliant Excerpts, Observations

(This is a guest post I wrote for Repeal Prohibition: Life, liberty and beer in Gujarat!, an excellent blog on the subject anchored by Anirudh Singh Bhati, a law student in Gandhinagar, and a friend from high school.)

Myth: Pubs, bars and drinking are against Indian culture.

The consumption of alcohol and other intoxicants is as ancient as Indian culture itself. People of the Indus Valley were known to produce liquor by fermenting grains and fruits. The consumption of Soma by Hindu gods is spoken of in glowing terms in the Vedas. Drinking isn’t against Indian culture. It’s one of the elements constituting our highly nuanced way of life.

Myth: Prohibition saves people from alcoholism.

This is akin to saying that every smoker is a chain smoker, or every chocolate eater is chocoholic. The intemperance of a drinker mixed with other psychological traits lead to addiction. You don’t ban cars because some  cause accidents. Most people don’t even own cars. Similarly for drinking, it’s pointless to demonise a harmless activity which some people indulge in.

Myth: Drinking is immoral and leads to crime.

The act of drinking itself is harmless. Millions of people drink billions of glasses of alcohol every day. They do not find the need to murder, steal, rape and arson. A huge majority of Indian states have not banned alcohol, and their citizens carry out the alcohol trade peacefully. So are all these millions of drinkers evil and immoral? Of course not.

Myth: Drinking ruins your health.

So does eating cheeseburgers and pizzas. Or smoking cigarettes. Chips, toast and beans can kill. But only when consumed in all the wrong quantities. Drinking in moderation, it is known, can have health benefits. Moderate drinkers are known to have sturdier cardio-vascular health. They are also known to be better guarded against hypertension, dementia and Alzheimer’s.

Myth: Prohibition in Gujarat works.

It doesn’t. Alcohol is a thriving trade in Gujarat. Rediff.com says the trade was worth Rs 100 million in 2002. Kingshuk Nag, Times of India Ahmedabad’s editor, says the Gujarat government loses Rs 2,500 crores each year in excise duty by sustaining prohibition. Imagine the revenues and employment it can generate by repealing the monstrosity that is the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949.

In Ahmedabad, a phone-call to your local bootlegger would have your fix delivered to your doorstep in 30 minutes flat — only at two or three times the price it sells for in neighbouring states.

None of this money is accounted for. The trade thrives with the complicity of the underworld, police, politicians and bureaucrats, who, no doubt, get their “cut”.

Prohibition requires crores of taxpayer money to be diverted into enforcing a draconian law to keep people from the harmless act of enjoying a harmless drink.

Myth: Drinking ruins poor families.

If true, it’s another case to repeal prohibition. Refer to the hooch tragedy of July 2009, where more than 100 daily wage earners from Ahmedabad’s slums lost their lives. In the absence of watering holes, they’d turned to bootleggers, bought spurious liquor, and paid with their lives.

Myth: This is Gujarati/Gandhian culture, we want it thus.

Prohibition makes decent citizens behave like criminals. Period.  We know alcohol is easily available in Gujarat. But why must you cower like criminals to procure it?

Mahatma Gandhi, a great man no doubt, stood by ideas of personal discipline and non-cooperation and non-violence to end British rule in India. But the British have gone home, and so must this silly law. As long as we let a nanny state tell us what to do with our lives, we can’t consider ourselves truly free.

I leave you a clip from the blog by Sauvik Chakraborty, titled Aspects Of Our “Common Loss”, which best sums up the situation:

Since bars are few and unaffordable in Delhi, most of the drinking goes on surreptitiously, in dark street corners, inside cars, in all kinds of shady places. Indeed, visit any sarkaari booze shop in Delhi and you will find, quite close to it, a private shop selling bottled water, soft drinks and plastic glasses. If you stick around the area for a while you will gather what is happening: ordinary people buy a “quarter” (180ml) bottle of some harsh grog, pick up water and a glass next door – and head for the nearest dark corner.

I joined a group of such happy drinkers in a dark corner some weeks ago. We all poured our drinks and I said “cheers” and took a small sip. All the other guys put their glasses to their mouths and did an incredible “bottoms up” – because they were too scared to hang around too long dithering over their drinks. No one wants to fall foul of the cops.

If anything, drinking in this manner is extremely uncivilized. We are expected to enjoy our drinks, sip them slowly, roll the fluid about the mouth and feel the taste. Enjoy! My companions in the dark corner did not enjoy their drinks at all. Their faces, after knocking back stiff harsh grogs in one shot, reflected great suffering rather than enjoyment. I felt sorry for them – and for their livers. And my hatred for the excisewallahs grew a lot stronger.

Comment away, even if you disagree with me, and we shall attempt to debate this like adults. In case you were wondering where I come from: I’ve had about five vodkas all my life and do not consider myself a drinker at all. But all around me are drinkers who’ve never murdered, stolen, raped or set buildings on fire.

Become a fan of Life, liberty and beer in Gujarat! on Facebook.

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Abhinay November 29, 2009 at 7:20 pm

Beta, I think the government loses more than Rs 2,500 each year in excise duty.

Reply

2 AR Hemant November 29, 2009 at 9:12 pm

Probably. I’m quoting TOI’s figures. Even the blog says it’s a ballpark figure.

Reply

3 Abhinav November 29, 2009 at 9:26 pm

Really nice myth breaking article.. But

I, being an adult, has seen that many idiots who usually over-drink lose their minds. They couldn’t even speak perfectly, we shouldn’t expect them to drive.

But, having said that, I believe imposing restrictions of any kind on anything will actually make the thing even more cherished. So, we shouldn’t promote drinking, rather we should just keep the figures under control. For example, the wine shops in Jaipur close at 8 PM. Of course, you may buy any given amount you want before it and preserve it to be consumed later but it has actually resulted in doing good to the society. Young kids (teenagers) with budding hormones should not get carried away by the charm and do stupid things while they should be concentrating upon the things that will make their future.

I don’t drink and neither I promote. But I do not stop anyone from drinking. I expect them to know morally that this much amount is enough to keep them awake.

Reply

4 AR Hemant November 29, 2009 at 9:41 pm

Thanks Abhinav. You’ve put it wisely: you don’t drink but you don’t mind others drinking. It’s tolerant and open-minded of you, which is how it should be. As far as people losing their minds is concerned, there should be strict law that punishes people: for causing harm to others, drunk or not. Being drunk entitles nobody to lose their minds. Also, if you make alcohol taboo for your children, it would only make their curiosity towards it grow.

Reply

5 vimoh November 29, 2009 at 10:57 pm

Makes sense. Banning alcohol to prevent crime is like banning currency notes to prevent robbery.

Reply

6 AR Hemant November 29, 2009 at 11:02 pm

Brilliant, sir. :D

Reply

7 Fresher Jobs November 30, 2009 at 11:31 am

Well said Vimoh :-)

Reply

8 Suresh Burde November 30, 2009 at 1:21 pm

Brilliant !!
A really thought provoking collection of thoughts, indeed.

Reply

9 Suresh Burde November 30, 2009 at 1:23 pm

And, I have just aadded http://hemant.urbanmunky.com/ to my favourite list. :)

Reply

10 AR Hemant November 30, 2009 at 1:36 pm

Many thanks, Suresh. You can also get my blog’s full feed delivered to your email. The link’s on the left panel.

Reply

11 Kingsley December 7, 2009 at 9:52 am

Cant agree more on the facts that has been discussed here in the article.

It is a very sad state of affairs that is happening in Gujarat. In the name of Gandhi’s birthplace, the people who bought in the law thinking all the people of the state would follow the virtues/thoughts what Gandhi preached.

But it is not so what has happened. This seems to be good deal for all scumbags of gujarat, the politicos,police,mobsters,and all of similar ilk. Having stayed there for more than two years did get a first hand experience of the same. Sorry people,i had no option,if i needed to get a drink had to call up these guys,and what to tell,impeccable customer service,quick delivery,good brands,even if it is 1am in the night,they did get you,side snacks,soda,cola with the alcohol. Seems its a very well organised and oiled network involving all people,they have a good supply chain and management. Think we can make a business case study out of that. Also there is an serious issue of adulterated liquor.Unless you have a good contact,you’re always in for a ride.

Such is the disgusting state of affairs.If quizzed about this to anyone,unless you’re really a close friend or known person everybody’s reaction would be a surprised WTF look(you’ll know yourself as your living here).Everything is Hush Hush and covered up well. Everybody is in the denial mode.This hypocrisy attitude should change.

There are people who want to gain by treating this major issue as a taboo just for their political gains.

Things should be acknowledged and change for better.

Reply

12 AR Hemant December 7, 2009 at 11:35 am

Well said, Kingsley. Your comment is a fantastic addition to the theme. Clearly, this is a huge business opportunity, not a moral or cultural threat.

Reply

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post:

</